<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Déjà Revue?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.durham21.co.uk/2010/01/deja-revue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.durham21.co.uk/2010/01/deja-revue/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 09:58:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://www.durham21.co.uk/2010/01/deja-revue/#comment-55115</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.durham21.co.uk/?p=5280#comment-55115</guid>
		<description>I am one of those sad people who feels mildly excited when i see one of the ex revue or wittank around durham. this means i am probably a bit mad but as well its only because theyre sooo good!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am one of those sad people who feels mildly excited when i see one of the ex revue or wittank around durham. this means i am probably a bit mad but as well its only because theyre sooo good!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevie</title>
		<link>http://www.durham21.co.uk/2010/01/deja-revue/#comment-55085</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.durham21.co.uk/?p=5280#comment-55085</guid>
		<description>I thought the show was great. 

The Wittank comparison is unsurprising. It would have been interesting to compare the new line-up with the old in order to fully appreciate the different direction the group has taken. I think it&#039;s a good, positive direction... a lot more fun and silly, which is what the Revue needs so roll on Comedyfest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the show was great. </p>
<p>The Wittank comparison is unsurprising. It would have been interesting to compare the new line-up with the old in order to fully appreciate the different direction the group has taken. I think it&#8217;s a good, positive direction&#8230; a lot more fun and silly, which is what the Revue needs so roll on Comedyfest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.durham21.co.uk/2010/01/deja-revue/#comment-55084</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.durham21.co.uk/?p=5280#comment-55084</guid>
		<description>wittank were amazing (&quot;RIM ME HARDY&quot;) but i saw comedyfest last year and the revue were brilliant, really really good. i reckon this years revue will be great too if given some time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wittank were amazing (&#8220;RIM ME HARDY&#8221;) but i saw comedyfest last year and the revue were brilliant, really really good. i reckon this years revue will be great too if given some time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.durham21.co.uk/2010/01/deja-revue/#comment-55080</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.durham21.co.uk/?p=5280#comment-55080</guid>
		<description>Fair review. I saw the show and thought pretty much along the same lines. The old Revue were a lot stronger but this is probably owing to experience more than anything... i never saw any of their stuff last year, just the returners show so maybe they were the same last year. 

also i seem to be the only person who didn&#039;t prefer wittank (saw there returners show as well). strange to compare this new line up with wittank as opposed to the old revue, which would have made more sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair review. I saw the show and thought pretty much along the same lines. The old Revue were a lot stronger but this is probably owing to experience more than anything&#8230; i never saw any of their stuff last year, just the returners show so maybe they were the same last year. </p>
<p>also i seem to be the only person who didn&#8217;t prefer wittank (saw there returners show as well). strange to compare this new line up with wittank as opposed to the old revue, which would have made more sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Mulligan</title>
		<link>http://www.durham21.co.uk/2010/01/deja-revue/#comment-55076</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Mulligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.durham21.co.uk/?p=5280#comment-55076</guid>
		<description>Cheers for that one, Donnachadh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers for that one, Donnachadh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Birt</title>
		<link>http://www.durham21.co.uk/2010/01/deja-revue/#comment-55075</link>
		<dc:creator>Birt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.durham21.co.uk/?p=5280#comment-55075</guid>
		<description>An extremely fair and eloquent review, from an author, of whom, I have come to expect nothing less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An extremely fair and eloquent review, from an author, of whom, I have come to expect nothing less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
