durham21
  • Durham21
  • Advertise on durham21
  • Get involved with durham21
  • Signup
  • Login
Home » News

Kingsgate Bridge: Work Suspended

Posted on 13th October 2005. No Comment

Email This Comment Email This Comment

Stephanie Offer reports on the mysterious re-opening of Kingsgate Bridge…

Delays
Refurbishment of Kingsgate Bridge “has been pulled off… for the moment” due to a dispute over whether or not Listed Building Consent is necessary for the work.

The County Council believed that the nature of the work they were carrying out and the materials being used meant that consent would not be necessary. However, the City Council disagree and work, which had been expected to last up to two weeks, has been suspended while discussions continue.

In addition once the County Council engineers got on site and actually started work they found that some technical details needed modifying.

Refurbishment
The County Council had been intending to refurbish the decking and its approaches, repairing and re-laying the concrete slabs which have lain in-situ since the bridge was opened by Durham University 40 years ago.

The bridge was designed by world renowned engineer/designer Ove Arup, best known for his work on landmarks such as the Sydney Harbour Bridge, the Pompidou Centre in Paris and London’s Millennium Bridge.

Kingsgate was opened by the University in November 1963. In 1993 it won the Concrete Society’s “Mature Concrete Structure Award”.

A spokesman for the County Council said, “The fact that we have put a hold on the repairs and refurbishment scheme does not in any way mean that the bridge is currently unsafe for pedestrian use.”

Email This Comment Email This Comment

No Comment »

  • Calvin said:

    Much as it’s annoying when it’s shut, the resurfacing is much needed. In winter it can be an icy deathtrap, paticularly for Hatfield drinkers such as myself. It’s concrete so you can’t salt it and an extended rough surface similar to what’s on the steps next to the bridge would be fantastic

    # 14 October 2005 at 1:35 am | reply
  • Calvin said:

    Much as it’s annoying when it’s shut, the resurfacing is much needed. In winter it can be an icy deathtrap, paticularly for Hatfield drinkers such as myself. It’s concrete so you can’t salt it and an extended rough surface similar to what’s on the steps next to the bridge would be fantastic

    # 14 October 2005 at 1:35 am | reply
  • Calvin said:

    Much as it’s annoying when it’s shut, the resurfacing is much needed. In winter it can be an icy deathtrap, paticularly for Hatfield drinkers such as myself. It’s concrete so you can’t salt it and an extended rough surface similar to what’s on the steps next to the bridge would be fantastic

    # 14 October 2005 at 1:35 am | reply
  • barney said:

    Pull it down. That’d solve the problem. Its a deathtrap that bridge…

    Replace it with a rope-bridge, or a free hang-glider service. Come on people – I’M MAKING SENSE!

    # 14 October 2005 at 1:46 am | reply
  • barney said:

    Pull it down. That’d solve the problem. Its a deathtrap that bridge…

    Replace it with a rope-bridge, or a free hang-glider service. Come on people – I’M MAKING SENSE!

    # 14 October 2005 at 1:46 am | reply
  • barney said:

    Pull it down. That’d solve the problem. Its a deathtrap that bridge…

    Replace it with a rope-bridge, or a free hang-glider service. Come on people – I’M MAKING SENSE!

    # 14 October 2005 at 1:46 am | reply
  • Anonymous said:

    or a tight-rope…

    # 14 October 2005 at 4:29 am | reply
  • Anonymous said:

    or a tight-rope…

    # 14 October 2005 at 4:29 am | reply
  • Anonymous said:

    or a tight-rope…

    # 14 October 2005 at 4:29 am | reply
  • Geoff Boycott said:

    I for one would be happy to see the bridge removed, but only on the condition that it be replaced and the gorge filled with the lifeless bodies of Hatfield drinkers, their demise usefully ensuring a thoroughfare be maintained.

    # 14 October 2005 at 7:22 am | reply
  • Geoff Boycott said:

    I for one would be happy to see the bridge removed, but only on the condition that it be replaced and the gorge filled with the lifeless bodies of Hatfield drinkers, their demise usefully ensuring a thoroughfare be maintained.

    # 14 October 2005 at 7:22 am | reply
  • Geoff Boycott said:

    I for one would be happy to see the bridge removed, but only on the condition that it be replaced and the gorge filled with the lifeless bodies of Hatfield drinkers, their demise usefully ensuring a thoroughfare be maintained.

    # 14 October 2005 at 7:22 am | reply
  • Anonymous said:

    So is it true that the bridge was designed by the same guy as Sydney Opera House… and that he was prouder of the former than the latter? So wrong!

    # 14 October 2005 at 6:05 pm | reply
  • Anonymous said:

    So is it true that the bridge was designed by the same guy as Sydney Opera House… and that he was prouder of the former than the latter? So wrong!

    # 14 October 2005 at 6:05 pm | reply
  • Anonymous said:

    So is it true that the bridge was designed by the same guy as Sydney Opera House… and that he was prouder of the former than the latter? So wrong!

    # 14 October 2005 at 6:05 pm | reply
  • Eblane said:

    The Opera House was a bit of disaster for the designer, and he was well and truly shafted over it.

    Bridges are nice and simple by comparison.

    # 17 October 2005 at 3:18 am | reply
  • Eblane said:

    The Opera House was a bit of disaster for the designer, and he was well and truly shafted over it.

    Bridges are nice and simple by comparison.

    # 17 October 2005 at 3:18 am | reply
  • Eblane said:

    The Opera House was a bit of disaster for the designer, and he was well and truly shafted over it.

    Bridges are nice and simple by comparison.

    # 17 October 2005 at 3:18 am | reply
  • Wolf said:

    I heard they were replacing the bridge for a hang tough arena. I am utterly devestated that the work isn’t going to be done for a while.

    However, I am in Durham for a few days and I will be signing autographs in the YTC. Wolf power!

    # 17 October 2005 at 7:07 pm | reply
  • Wolf said:

    I heard they were replacing the bridge for a hang tough arena. I am utterly devestated that the work isn’t going to be done for a while.

    However, I am in Durham for a few days and I will be signing autographs in the YTC. Wolf power!

    # 17 October 2005 at 7:07 pm | reply
  • Wolf said:

    I heard they were replacing the bridge for a hang tough arena. I am utterly devestated that the work isn’t going to be done for a while.

    However, I am in Durham for a few days and I will be signing autographs in the YTC. Wolf power!

    # 17 October 2005 at 7:07 pm | reply
  • mott said:

    I’m with you Geoff on this one

    # 18 October 2005 at 4:08 am | reply
  • mott said:

    I’m with you Geoff on this one

    # 18 October 2005 at 4:08 am | reply
  • mott said:

    I’m with you Geoff on this one

    # 18 October 2005 at 4:08 am | reply
  • fingers said:

    or we could just push the whole of Hatfield college into the river, knocking the bridge down with it, thereby ensuring that one of Durham’s more iritating structures was removed for good, and getting rid of the bridge as well.

    with the added bonus of killing a few toffs…

    # 18 October 2005 at 5:26 am | reply
  • fingers said:

    or we could just push the whole of Hatfield college into the river, knocking the bridge down with it, thereby ensuring that one of Durham’s more iritating structures was removed for good, and getting rid of the bridge as well.

    with the added bonus of killing a few toffs…

    # 18 October 2005 at 5:26 am | reply
  • fingers said:

    or we could just push the whole of Hatfield college into the river, knocking the bridge down with it, thereby ensuring that one of Durham’s more iritating structures was removed for good, and getting rid of the bridge as well.

    with the added bonus of killing a few toffs…

    # 18 October 2005 at 5:26 am | reply
  • BC said:

    I think it would be much more amusing to keep the hatfield buildings but put Cuths/Castle students in them. You could then move all hatfield students to a tent city (or similar) up by Tesco and thus maximise the annoyance and irritation factors for hatfielders.

    # 18 October 2005 at 7:36 am | reply
  • BC said:

    I think it would be much more amusing to keep the hatfield buildings but put Cuths/Castle students in them. You could then move all hatfield students to a tent city (or similar) up by Tesco and thus maximise the annoyance and irritation factors for hatfielders.

    # 18 October 2005 at 7:36 am | reply
  • BC said:

    I think it would be much more amusing to keep the hatfield buildings but put Cuths/Castle students in them. You could then move all hatfield students to a tent city (or similar) up by Tesco and thus maximise the annoyance and irritation factors for hatfielders.

    # 18 October 2005 at 7:36 am | reply
  • Matt WJ said:

    We’re all so negative about the ol’ bridge, but compared to the grey visor eyesore of DSU, it’s actually quite attractive.

    # 18 October 2005 at 3:04 pm | reply
  • Matt WJ said:

    We’re all so negative about the ol’ bridge, but compared to the grey visor eyesore of DSU, it’s actually quite attractive.

    # 18 October 2005 at 3:04 pm | reply
  • Matt WJ said:

    We’re all so negative about the ol’ bridge, but compared to the grey visor eyesore of DSU, it’s actually quite attractive.

    # 18 October 2005 at 3:04 pm | reply
  • Morris said:

    But thats like saying that a turd lookes good when curled next to a pile of sick.

    Excuse me…

    # 19 October 2005 at 2:39 am | reply
  • Morris said:

    But thats like saying that a turd lookes good when curled next to a pile of sick.

    Excuse me…

    # 19 October 2005 at 2:39 am | reply
  • Morris said:

    But thats like saying that a turd lookes good when curled next to a pile of sick.

    Excuse me…

    # 19 October 2005 at 2:39 am | reply
  • Crom said:

    It’s definitely got a Grade II listing, and that’s where the trouble lies. When the workmen tarred and pebble-dashed the stairs at the Hatfield end, you know with that rubbishy yellow bird seed stuff, the next day I passed by and was assailed by two officious looking chaps asing if I knew how and when it had happened. Clearly the entire process went a bit tits-up from the outset.

    # 19 October 2005 at 7:05 am | reply
  • Crom said:

    It’s definitely got a Grade II listing, and that’s where the trouble lies. When the workmen tarred and pebble-dashed the stairs at the Hatfield end, you know with that rubbishy yellow bird seed stuff, the next day I passed by and was assailed by two officious looking chaps asing if I knew how and when it had happened. Clearly the entire process went a bit tits-up from the outset.

    # 19 October 2005 at 7:05 am | reply
  • Crom said:

    It’s definitely got a Grade II listing, and that’s where the trouble lies. When the workmen tarred and pebble-dashed the stairs at the Hatfield end, you know with that rubbishy yellow bird seed stuff, the next day I passed by and was assailed by two officious looking chaps asing if I knew how and when it had happened. Clearly the entire process went a bit tits-up from the outset.

    # 19 October 2005 at 7:05 am | reply
  • Boycott said:

    I think the “yellow bird seed stuff” was probably just vomit.

    # 20 October 2005 at 3:02 pm | reply
  • Boycott said:

    I think the “yellow bird seed stuff” was probably just vomit.

    # 20 October 2005 at 3:02 pm | reply
  • Boycott said:

    I think the “yellow bird seed stuff” was probably just vomit.

    # 20 October 2005 at 3:02 pm | reply
  • Roddy said:

    I quite like it. Pull down Dunelm any old day, but the bridge has something else to it. Shame it’s an ice rink in Winter. I saw an elderly lady thud to the ground last year, and it took me half a minute to get there without involuntarily landing beside her. And I’m fairly sure it’s Grade I.

    # 29 October 2005 at 8:30 am | reply
  • Roddy said:

    I quite like it. Pull down Dunelm any old day, but the bridge has something else to it. Shame it’s an ice rink in Winter. I saw an elderly lady thud to the ground last year, and it took me half a minute to get there without involuntarily landing beside her. And I’m fairly sure it’s Grade I.

    # 29 October 2005 at 8:30 am | reply
  • Roddy said:

    I quite like it. Pull down Dunelm any old day, but the bridge has something else to it. Shame it’s an ice rink in Winter. I saw an elderly lady thud to the ground last year, and it took me half a minute to get there without involuntarily landing beside her. And I’m fairly sure it’s Grade I.

    # 29 October 2005 at 8:30 am | reply

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

There are currently 3 users online.
dst
stockholm
--
mojo
--
hamlet
-- -- -- advert
© 2001 - 2011 Durham21.co.uk.